California Superlotto The Probability You Discover Winning Numbers Formula by Sherif Monem

The probability you discover a winning numbers formula is zero, an absolute zero. If you buy all combinations and spend more than 40 million dollars then you will definitely win. Now you may share with one or more lucky winners then you loose, then you pay federal taxes, then you are a looser and in a hole. If the Jack pot is twice the more number of combinations then you definitely you win however, there may be other winners who will win also the jackpot and you will lose.
A mathematical formula does not exist. The best you can do is to reduce the pool of numbers to less than 47 and improve your odds but the chance of winning will not be 100% but higher than average with probability less than 100% because there may me be one number or more out of the group of number you have selected. You never can block a sneaky number.

For the mathematical puffs; what will be the probability of winning correctly 5 correct numbers out of reduced pool of 40 numbers instead of 47 total numbers?

30 numbers?

20 numbers?

10 numbers?

5 numbers? check the odd in the purchasing ticket.

Now the big headache is the mega or bonus number, ....... wild, wild,   .... no handle on it.

Note: The California Super-lotto discussion applies to other types of lotteries.

Strategy: Devise to win 3 out of 5 numbers with enhanced probability. So if you play 5 games and win 3 numbers out of 5 you win say 8 to 11 dollars. Now you almost doubled your $5 and had a shot to win the Jackpot as well.

Improving the odds to pick lucky numbers may not depend on a probability mathematical formula but rather using a scheme.

The Distance Between Two Points Mathematics and Philosophy Sherif Monem California

To start with how to measure the distance between two points? Are they located in plain surface? A spherical surface? Any other type of surface? Are using a ruler? How you know it is 100% straight not bent any along? How you know it is 100% calibrated? How it was calibrated? What is the accuracy of this calibration?
Quickly, you realize is that the distance between two points is not straight forward as you may have thought. Now, how about two points in space? Simply, assume one point on the moon and one point on the earth. It gets very much greater complicated? What metric you use? Its accuracy? Then it gets more complicated as the element of time become a parameter.

Actually, one gets entangled, trying to define what is a point?

Life and intelligence are twine Theory Sherif Monem

It is assumption that if life exists there will be intelligence exhibited by it. A mystery of the universe? Hard to explain the relationship???

Sherif S. Monem Theory of Dreams and Explanation

The dreams are aroused by the regions of brain that were actively stimulated the day or two days earlier, or images you have seen during the day. They come appear incoherently and  unconnected during the dream. If you were cleaning carpet or your mind busy thinking about a carpet during the day you may, have dream about carpets in strange way.

There is a logical mechanism that is active during you being awake up that makes you think rationally, however, this logical mechanism is not active during the sleep.

When you are fully awake you dismiss lot of thoughts that seem absurd. They are dismissed subconsciously and you are not aware of that process

During sleep you may dream as you are flying for example, which such thought do not occur while you are awake.

There are certain stimulation in the brain regarding events that last longer than others that may cause dreams. Although a day may be common but for strong stimulation it can be two days or longer that triggers dreams.

Note: The theory will be further expounded on.

The Birth and Death of God and The Universe Sherif Monem Philosophy

When the universe is born there is the birth of god, whence, God creates and develops the universe. God also establish the law of physics that govern the universe. The universe expands and god still governs the universe. Then the expansion slows, stops then there will be contraction that can be as aging of god. Finally, the universe is sucked into singularity and totally collapse. This can be seen as the death of god.
It is gone conclusion that the human race had vanished before,  much, much earlier.
New God, Universe
The singularity acts as a kernel of new explosion and new god is born to govern the universe. The new god has new design for the universe and new physical laws are established. This process will be repeated over, over and forever and a new god will be born and die every time.

A theory and a proposal of the Universe Big Bang Birth and Rebirth by Sherif Sayed Monem

My theory and proposal for the Big Bang Event is that an oval shaped Super Super concentration of energy started to spin over an axis of rotation at very fast accelerating speeds emitting pulps of energy in space in a planer formation. Each of the energy out-spurts created to be a galaxy. This created our present universe which looks like more or less planer because of the fast original spin.

I theorize further that inside the Big Bang massive finite space of energy were countless number of rotating energy balls, or of saucer shape. The balls rotation causing friction between each other prompted the scattering of these over heated balls in space in random way, and at fantastic speeds creating our universe of galaxies and other heavenly observed formations.

Inside the energy rotating balls or saucers themselves are millions or more of tiny energy particles like crowd of dust. When the energy rotating balls are thrown out of the mother bang ball the dust of particles will constitute the individual stars of the galaxies.

The spiral shape of the galaxies tells about the vast rotating saucers or disks that existed inside the bang ball.

It is silly to think otherwise that the bang ball consisted of single uniform energy.

The origin of the bang ball is the prior collapse of the universe including galaxies and heavenly bodies.

All this points to the infinite birth and rebirth of the universe. The steady state or an original explosion of the energy ball without prior existence is nonsense.

A philosophical question is every birth of the universe is for better one and what better one may mean?

The Big Bang Prior and After Theory by Sherif S. Monem

My theory and proposal for the Big Bang Event is that an oval shaped Super Super concentration of energy started to spin over an axis of rotation at very fast accelerating speeds emitting pulps of energy in space in a planer formation. Each of the energy out-spurts created to be a galaxy. This created our present universe which looks like more or less planer because of the fast original spin.

//


I theorize further that inside the Big Bang massive finite space of energy were countless number of rotating energy balls, or of saucer shape. The balls rotation causing friction between each other prompted the scattering of these over heated balls in space in random way, and at fantastic speeds creating our universe of galaxies and other heavenly observed formations.

Inside the energy rotating balls or saucers themselves are millions or more of tiny energy particles like crowd of dust. When the energy rotating balls are thrown out of the mother bang ball the dust of particles will constitute the individual stars of the galaxies.

The spiral shape of the galaxies tells about the vast rotating saucers or disks that existed inside the bang ball.

It is silly to think otherwise that the bang ball consisted of single uniform energy.

The origin of the bang ball is the prior collapse of the universe including galaxies and heavenly bodies.

All this points to the infinite birth and rebirth of the universe. The steady state or an original explosion of the energy ball without prior existence is nonsense.

A philosophical question is every birth of the universe is for better one and what better one may mean?



////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Literature

Why is the Universe flat and not spherical? (Advanced)

 

My question involves the Universe is flat theory. If there was a big bang why would the Universe be flat? I would think that the Big Bang would result in a sphere shape mass of energy, light, matter, heat, radiation, etc. and whatever else expanding outward while maintaining the shape of the sphere.

The meaning of the Big Bang has been very often misunderstood. It is thought that something exploded somewhere and then the exploded part expanded to where we are currently. This is not correct. Before the Big Bang, there was no space or time. So, there is nothing "outside" the Big Bang. The Universe simply expanded from a very small volume into a huge volume, and this expansion is occuring even today. So, the place where we are right now corresponds to some place in a very small volume in the very early Universe. Hence, the Big Bang occured EVERYWHERE in the Universe. It occured at all places including the place where we are right now.

Why does the Universe look flat? This was one of the perplexing questions in cosmology for a long time. Today, most astronomers believe in the theory of inflation (and there are pieces of evidence supporting this). According to this theory, the Universe underwent exponential expansion about 10-30 seconds after the Big Bang. The result was that something of the size of an atom expanded to the size of the solar system by the end of the inflationary epoch.

If this were the case, irrespective of the original geometry of the Universe, it would appear flat to us. The analogy will be to take a balloon; we can easily see it to be rounded; now blow the balloon to a very large volume and then put a small ant on its surface. The ant will think that it is on a sheet; it cannot detect the curvature. To put this in another way, the distances that we probe are way too small to detect any possible curvature in the Universe.

 If as you say "the distances that we probe are way too small to detect any possible curvature in the Universe" ... how can we accept recent "proofs" of a flat universe? Are all attempts to prove the flatness or otherwise of the universe limited to data collected from the observable universe? If so, and we suppose our view to be equivalent that of a short sighted ant on earth, surely it must be an impossibility to find such a proof, unless of course information can travel faster than light.

First, you have to distinguish between "universe" and "observable universe". Technically, "universe" constitutes everything that exists, while "observable universe" constitutes everything that exists within our horizon (that is, the volume of the universe within which light has had time to reach us). Every observation we can ever make is confined to the observable universe, and we have no way of knowing for sure what's happening beyond the horizon. But many people use "universe" as shorthand for "observable universe", which can create some confusion. So when we say "WMAP provides strong evidence that the universe is flat", we really mean "WMAP provides strong evidence that the observable universe is flat".

However, according to inflationary theory, even if the universe has some curvature, the observable universe should be flat at the level at which we're capable of measuring it. But we don't *know* that inflationary theory is correct. So yes, it is important to do experiments like the one performed by WMAP. If we were to detect deviations from flatness in the observable universe, then it would provide evidence against inflation.

//
http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/
//

The Origin of the Earth and Planets Hypotheses and Theory by Sherif S. Monem

Our earth and other planets were originated as direct off shoot from the sun. At these moments of creation the sun was rotating at very high speed about its axis that was gyrating and the shooting of huge massive bodies of gases into speed at tremendous velocities created the earth and planets.